Republikanen Pat Buchanan: ”Breivik may be right”

Pat Buchanan, fd medarbetare till såväl Richard Nixon och Ronald Reagan, har anslutit sig till det gäng av tyckare som anser att ”Breivik may be right”.

A good rule of thumb for political commentary — or life in general — is that terrorists are never right. People who go on mass shooting sprees are never right. The man or woman who lights the fuse on a bomb that blows up a government building is never right. Their actions are wrong, and the ideas that motivated them are wrong.

Pat Buchanan, however, has discovered in the insane bigotry that allegedly animated Anders Behring Breivik’s horrendous acts of violence in Norway a lesson about Europe and Islam that we maybe should take to heart.

After a perfunctory denunciation of Breivik as an ”evil … cold-blooded, calculating killer,” Buchanan notes that Breivik’s motivation was ”to bring attention to his ideas and advance his cause: a Crusader’s war between the real Europe and the ‘cultural Marxists’ and Muslims they invited in to alter the ethnic character and swamp the culture of the Old Continent.”

Buchanan then gives the alleged terrorist an assist, writing that Breivik’s vision of a grand conflict between European Muslims and Christians ”may be right”: Media Matters

Tilläggas kan att samma Buchanan kläckte ur sig följande när Obama utnämnde Elena Kagan till US HD; ”If Kagan is confirmed, Jews, who represent less than 2 percent of the U.S. population, will have 33 percent of the Supreme Court seats. Is this the Democrats’ idea of diversity”.

För den som undrar stöttade Buchanan Georg W Bush i valet 2004.

Intressant tankegods som rör sig i konservativa kretsar…

NetRoots | SAP | Pingat på Intressant| Politometern

About these ads

Etiketter: , , ,

Ett svar to “Republikanen Pat Buchanan: ”Breivik may be right””

  1. Madeleine Says:

    One thing I’ve noticed is the fact that there are plenty of misconceptions regarding the financial institutions intentions any time talking about home foreclosure. One misconception in particular is the fact that the bank needs to have your house. The financial institution wants your cash, not your house. They want the amount of money they loaned you along with interest. Steering clear of the bank will draw any foreclosed final result. Thanks for your article.

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s


Följ

Få meddelanden om nya inlägg via e-post.

Gör sällskap med 1 230 andra följare

%d bloggare gillar detta: